New rules will hurt more than they will help
act-new-zealand
Wed Mar 30 2016 13:00:00 GMT+1300 (New Zealand Daylight Time)
New rules will hurt more than they will help
Wednesday, 30 March 2016, 1:39 pm
Press Release: ACT New Zealand
Earthquake-prone buildings rules will hurt more than they will help
Press release: ACT New Zealand
March 30, 2016. 1:15pm
Earthquake-prone buildings legislation will hurt regional New Zealand unless changes are made, says ACT Leader David Seymour.
“The government’s own analysis shows the new rules will have little impact on public safety and will waste three quarters of a billion dollars. The real costs are likely to be much higher – in the billions,” says Mr Seymour.
“Regional communities, which have older building stocks, will be especially hard hit and could become ghost towns as people are forced to undertake expensive engineering assessments and abandon buildings that pose minimal risk to human life.
“The best way to honour the tragedy of the Canterbury earthquakes is to actually make good policy that protects people according to their actual risks.
“I have put forward two common-sense changes to the bill and call on the government and opposition parties to set up.
“First, low risk areas should be exempt. Does it really make sense to waste hundreds of millions in Auckland, Northland, and Southland on strengthening when the chance of a severe earthquake is extremely low? As an Aucklander I have a one in 120,000 chance of being in a severe earthquake this year (with a much lower risk of dying in one). Meanwhile I have a one in 10,000 chance of dying in a car crash, and a one in 500 chance of dying of cancer. Yet the government is imposing huge costs on my city to deal with small earthquake risks. The money is better spent making a real difference elsewhere.
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
“Next, it makes sense that the occupancy of a building should be taken into account when assessing its risk, as well as location and build type. For example, a rural wooden church only used once a week by a small congregation is unlikely to pose risk as it’s empty most of the time. This approach, supported by the earthquake experts at crown research organisation GNS Science, would address the real risks faced by people, rather than just imposing a blanket standard across all buildings.”
ENDS
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
a.supporter:hover {background:#EC4438!important;} @media screen and (max-width: 480px) { #byline-block div.byline-block {padding-right:16px;}}
Using Scoop for work?
Scoop is free for personal use, but you’ll need a licence for work use. This is part of our Ethical Paywall and how we fund Scoop. Join today with plans starting from less than $3 per week, plus gain access to exclusive Pro features.
Join Pro Individual Find out more
Find more from ACT New Zealand on InfoPages.