MPs misuse research on smoking – Study
university-of-otago
Mon Dec 10 2007 13:00:00 GMT+1300 (New Zealand Daylight Time)
MPs misuse research on smoking – Study
Monday, 10 December 2007, 10:15 am
Press Release: University of Otago
MPs misuse research on smoking – Study
A new study has found that denial by New Zealand MPs of the risks of second-hand smoke (SHS) was common during 2000-2005. Almost half of the 21 MPs who spoke about health research on SHS denied or were sceptical that it was harmful, according to the University of Otago, Wellington study.
At least five of these MPs also used tobacco industry versions of research, which diminished or denied the health risks from second-hand smoke.
“The research clearly shows a need for the health sector to counter tobacco industry misinformation” says Dr George Thomson from the University’s Department of Public Health.
The research covered the period from 2000-2005, when there was intense debate about the extension of smokefree legislation to include bars and clubs. There was also strong opposition from much of the hospitality industry to the new legislation.
The research analysed parliamentary debates, media reports, parliamentary communications and media releases for statements on SHS. It found repeated attacks by MPs on the key research conducted by Professor Alistair Woodward and Dr Murray Laugesen. This research gave an estimate of nearly 400 deaths per year in New Zealand from SHS.
Over the six years, at least nine MPs from four different parties cast doubt on the research evidence of harm to health from SHS. They were: Doug Woolerton and Dail Jones (NZ First), David Carter and Richard Worth (National), Heather Roy and Deborah Coddington (ACT), and Peter Dunne, Marc Alexander and Paul Adams (United Future).
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
David Carter, amongst other critical statements, described the New Zealand SHS death estimates as a “huge manufacturing and embellishment of the story about the effect of second-hand smoke on peoples’ health.” This is despite extensive international scientific evidence supporting these estimates.
Dail Jones stated that ‘Custard is more dangerous than second-hand smoke. …[and] milk …is worse than second-hand smoke.’
“This study indicates how research can be denied, misrepresented and distorted by some politicians, even when the science is clear, and 90% of voters believed SHS is harmful,” says Dr Thomson.
ENDS
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
a.supporter:hover {background:#EC4438!important;} @media screen and (max-width: 480px) { #byline-block div.byline-block {padding-right:16px;}}
Using Scoop for work?
Scoop is free for personal use, but you’ll need a licence for work use. This is part of our Ethical Paywall and how we fund Scoop. Join today with plans starting from less than $3 per week, plus gain access to exclusive Pro features.
Join Pro Individual Find out more
Find more from University of Otago on InfoPages.