Election campaigns: corporates versus cake stalls

green-party

Wed Jul 25 2007 12:00:00 GMT+1200 (New Zealand Standard Time)

Election campaigns: corporates versus cake stalls

Wednesday, 25 July 2007, 9:02 am
Press Release: Green Party

Election campaigns remain corporates versus cake stalls

Despite promises to make election campaigns more democratic, the "corporates versus cake stalls" system remains, says Greens Co-Leader Jeanette Fitzsimons.

"By ignoring Green proposals for full disclosure of the source of donations above $1000, the Government has missed a major opportunity in terms of fairness. Instead the public will continue to be in the dark about who is paying the piper."

The danger of a party being in effect "owned" by a corporation or wealthy individual remains, Ms Fitzsimons says.

"Justice Minister Mark Burton waxed lyrical in the House today about a 'level playing field' but then in answer to a supplementary question from me seemed to admit bumps in the field.

A requirement in the new proposal that parties declared donations over $20,000 within a fortnight of receiving them made sense but it meant little when the identity of that donor could be kept secret. Secretive trusts and anonymous donors could still fund the National and Labour parties in the 2008 campaign, while more democratically-based parties run sausage sizzles and cake stalls.

In 2005, National received $1.7m from shadowy trusts while Labour received $300,000 from anonymous donors, according to Ms Fitzsimons.

ends

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

a.supporter:hover {background:#EC4438!important;} @media screen and (max-width: 480px) { #byline-block div.byline-block {padding-right:16px;}}

Using Scoop for work?

Scoop is free for personal use, but you’ll need a licence for work use. This is part of our Ethical Paywall and how we fund Scoop. Join today with plans starting from less than $3 per week, plus gain access to exclusive Pro features.

Join Pro Individual Find out more

Find more from Green Party on InfoPages.